Machine studying and speculation pushed optimization of bull semen cryopreservation media
[ad_1]
Ugur, M. R. et al. Advances in cryopreservation of bull sperm. Entrance. Vet. Sci. 6, 1–15 (2019).
Benson, J. D., Woods, E. J., Walters, E. M. & Critser, J. Okay. The cryobiology of spermatozoa. Theriogenology 78, 1682–1699 (2012).
Amirat, L. et al. Bull semen in vitro fertility after cryopreservation utilizing egg yolk LDL: A comparability with Optidyl®, a business egg yolk extender. Theriogenology 61, 895–907 (2004).
Yoon, S. J., Kwon, W. S., Rahman, M. S., Lee, J. S. & Pang, M. G. A novel strategy to figuring out bodily markers of cryo-damage in bull spermatozoa. PLoS ONE 10, 1 (2015).
Medeiros, C. M. O., Forell, F., Oliveira, A. T. D. & Rodrigues, J. L. Present standing of sperm cryopreservation: Why isn’t it higher?. Theriogenology 1, 5327–5344 (2002).
Pojprasath, T., Lohachit, C., Techakumphu, M., Stout, T. & Tharasanit, T. Improved cryopreservability of stallion sperm utilizing a sorbitol-based freezing extender. Theriogenology 75, 1742–1749 (2011).
Lonergan, P. Historic and futuristic developments in bovine semen know-how. Animal 12, s4–s18 (2018).
Mousavi, S. M. et al. Comparability of two totally different antioxidants in a nano lecithin-based extender for bull sperm cryopreservation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 209, 1 (2019).
Murphy, E. M. et al. Affect of bull age, ejaculate quantity, and season of assortment on semen manufacturing and sperm motility parameters in holstein friesian bulls in a business synthetic insemination centre. J. Anim. Sci. 96, 2408–2418 (2018).
Thurston, L. M., Watson, P. F. & Holt, W. V. Semen cryopreservation: A genetic clarification for species and particular person variation?. Cryo-Letters 23, 255–262 (2002).
Sieme, H., Oldenhof, H. & Wolkers, W. F. Mode of motion of cryoprotectants for sperm preservation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 169, 2–5 (2016).
Ashrafi, I., Kohram, H. & Ardabili, F. F. Antioxidative results of melatonin on kinetics, microscopic and oxidative parameters of cryopreserved bull spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 139, 25–30 (2013).
ChaithraShree, A. R. et al. Impact of melatonin on bovine sperm traits and ultrastructure modifications following cryopreservation. Vet. Med. Sci. 6, 177–186 (2020).
Barbas, J. P. & Mascarenhas, R. D. Cryopreservation of home animal sperm cells. Cell Tissue Financial institution. 10, 49–62 (2009).
Galbraith, S. C., Bhatia, H., Liu, H. & Yoon, S. Media formulation optimization: present and future alternatives. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 22, 42–47 (2018).
Grzesik, P. & Warth, S. C. One-time optimization of superior T cell tradition media utilizing a machine studying pipeline. Entrance. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 1 (2021).
Bedbrook, C. N., Yang, Okay. Okay., Rice, A. J., Gradinaru, V. & Arnold, F. H. Machine studying to design integral membrane channelrhodopsins for environment friendly eukaryotic expression and plasma membrane localization. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, 1 (2017).
Pollock, Okay., Budenske, J. W., McKenna, D. H., Dosa, P. I. & Hubel, A. Algorithm-driven optimization of cryopreservation protocols for transfusion mannequin cell sorts together with Jurkat cells and mesenchymal stem cells. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 11, 2806–2815 (2017).
Pi, C. H., Dosa, P. I. & Hubel, A. Differential evolution for the optimization of DMSO-free cryoprotectants: Affect of management parameters. J. Biomech. Eng. 142, 1–10 (2020).
Li, R., Hornberger, Okay., Dutton, J. R. & Hubel, A. Cryopreservation of human iPS cell aggregates in a DMSO-free answer—An optimization and comparative examine. Entrance. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 1 (2020).
Desai, Okay. M., Survase, S. A., Saudagar, P. S., Lele, S. S. & Singhal, R. S. Comparability of synthetic neural community (ANN) and response floor methodology (RSM) in fermentation media optimization: Case examine of fermentative manufacturing of scleroglucan. Biochem. Eng. J. 41, 266–273 (2008).
Baş, D. & Boyacı, İH. Modeling and optimization II: Comparability of estimation capabilities of response floor methodology with synthetic neural networks in a biochemical response. J. Meals Eng. 78, 846–854 (2007).
I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, A. C. Deep Studying (MIT Press, 2016).
Myers, R. H. & Montgomery, D. C. Response floor methodology: Course of and product in optimization utilizing designed experiments (1995).
Mayer, D. T. & Lasley, J. F. The think about egg yolk affecting the resistance, storage potentialities, and fertilizing capability of mammalian spermatozoa. J. Anim. Sci. 4, 261–269 (1945).
Tempo, M. M. & Graham, E. F. Parts in egg yolk which defend bovine spermatozoa throughout freezing. J. Anim. Sci. 39, 1144–1149 (1974).
Liu, Z., Foote, R. H. & Brockett, C. C. Survival of bull sperm frozen at totally different charges in media various in osmolarity. Cryobiology 37, 219–230 (1998).
Purdy, P. H. & Graham, J. Okay. Impact of cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrin on the cryosurvival of bull sperm. Cryobiology 48, 36–45 (2004).
Raheja, N., Grewal, S., Sharma, N., Kumar, N. & Choudhary, S. A evaluate on semen extenders and components utilized in cattle and buffalo bull semen preservation. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud. 6, 239–245 (2018).
Forero-Gonzalez, R. A. et al. Results of bovine sperm cryopreservation utilizing totally different freezing strategies and cryoprotective brokers on plasma, acrosomal and mitochondrial membranes. Andrologia 44, 154–159 (2012).
El-Sheshtawy, R. I., Sisy, G. A. & El-Nattat, W. S. Results of various concentrations of sucrose or trehalose on the post-thawing high quality of cattle bull semen. Asian Pac. J. Reprod. 4, 26–31 (2015).
Woelders, H., Matthijs, A. & Engel, B. Results of trehalose and sucrose, osmolality of the freezing medium, and cooling fee on viability and intactness of bull sperm after freezing and thawing. Cryobiology https://doi.org/10.1006/cryo.1997.2028 (1997).
Ahmad, E. & Aksoy, M. Trehalose as a cryoprotective agent for the sperm cells: A mini evaluate. Anim. Heal. Prod. Hyg. 1, 123–129 (2012).
Foote, R. H. & Kaprotht, M. T. Giant batch freezing of bull semen: Impact of time of freezing and fructose on fertility. J. Dairy Sci. 85, 453–456 (2002).
Purdy, P. H. A evaluate on goat sperm cryopreservation. Small Rumin. Res. 63, 215–225 (2006).
Fowler, A. & Toner, M. Cryo-injury and biopreservation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1066, 119–135 (2006).
Hardeland, R., Reiter, R. J., Poeggeler, B. & Tan, D. The importance of the metabolism of the neurohormone melatonin: Antioxidative safety and formation of bioactive substances. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 17, 347–357 (1993).
Li, C. et al. Detection of nerve development issue (NGF) and its particular receptor (TrkA) in ejaculated bovine sperm, and the consequences of NGF on sperm operate. Theriogenology 74, 1615–1622 (2010).
Saeednia, S., Shabani Nashtaei, M., Bahadoran, H., Aleyasin, A. & Amidi, F. Impact of nerve development issue on sperm high quality in asthenozoosprmic males throughout cryopreservation. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 14, 1–8 (2016).
Storn, R. & Worth, Okay. Differential evolution–a easy and environment friendly heuristic for world optimization over steady areas. J. Glob. Optim. 11, 341–359 (1997).
Awad, M. M. Impact of some permeating cryoprotectants on CASA motility leads to cryopreserved bull spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 123, 157–162 (2011).
Gororo, E., Makuza, S. M., Chidzwondo, F. & Chatiza, F. P. Variation in sperm cryosurvival isn’t modified by changing the cryoprotectant glycerol with ethylene glycol in bulls. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 55, 1210–1218 (2020).
Rota, A., Milani, C., Cabianca, G. & Martini, M. Comparability between glycerol and ethylene glycol for canine semen cryopreservation. Theriogenology 65, 1848–1858 (2006).
Mehta, V., Pareek, P., Kumar, A. & Purohit, G. N. Comparative impact of various concentrations of glycerol and ethylene glycol and temperature on cryopreservation of ram semen. Res. J. Vet. Pract. 8, 1 (2020).
Swelum, A. A., Mansour, H. A., Elsayed, A. A. & Amer, H. A. Evaluating ethylene glycol with glycerol for cryopreservation of buffalo bull semen in egg-yolk containing extenders. Theriogenology 76, 833–842 (2011).
Kowsar, R., Ronasi, S., Sadeghi, N., Sadeghi, Okay. & Miyamoto, A. Epidermal development issue alleviates the unfavorable impression of urea on frozen-thawed bovine sperm, however the subsequent developmental competence is compromised. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–13 (2021).
Miller, W. J. & Vandemark, N. L. The affect of glycerol degree, numerous temperature features and sure different components on the survival of bull spermatozoa at sub-zero temperatures. J. Dairy Sci. 37, 45–51 (1954).
Bhat, M. H., Blondin, P., Vincent, P. & Benson, J. D. Low concentrations of 3-O-methylglucose enhance publish thaw restoration in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. Cryobiology 95, 15–19 (2020).
R Core Crew. R: A Language and Setting for Statistical Computing. (2021).
Ogle, D. H., Wheeler, P. & Dinno, A. FSA: Fisheries Inventory Evaluation. (2020).
Wellek, S. & Ziegler, P. EQUIVNONINF: Testing for Equivalence and Noninferiority. (2021).
Wellek, S. Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence. (Chapman and Corridor/CRC, 2010).
Tu, F. Experimental and Computational Approaches to Optimizing Bovine Gamete Cryopreservation. (College Of Saskatchewan, 2021).
[ad_2]
Source_link
