Apple ‘quietly requested Amazon to dam rival advertisements on its product pages’

Apple reportedly requested Amazon to cease competitor advertisements from showing on its product pages.

In response, the retail large allegedly agreed to solely serve advertisements and proposals on the very backside of Apple product pages – a gesture it doesn’t present to rival manufacturers like Samsung and Microsoft.

This preferential therapy has supposedly enhanced Apple’s product pages, making a extra streamlined person expertise, which has induced frustration amongst the corporate’s rivals, based on Enterprise Insider.

Why we care. The alleged preferential therapy provides Apple a definite benefit over rivals, creating an uneven enjoying area that makes it tougher for opponents to succeed and understand a return on their funding.

What this implies. If you seek for Apple merchandise on Amazon, you’ll discover that competing merchandise are nonetheless listed, however Amazon restricts the advertisements positioned above, beneath, and between the outcomes. As an illustration, a seek for an iPhone 15 shows just one Apple product banner on the prime of the web page and one other advert banner on the very backside:

Screenshot 2023 11 16 At 15.17.05 754x600
Screenshot 2023 11 16 At 15.20.58 800x520

Nonetheless, searches for competing gadgets, such because the Samsung Galaxy S23, present advertisements for varied services and products all through the outcomes web page.

Screenshot 2023 11 16 At 15.16.44 758x600
Screenshot 2023 11 16 At 15.21.09 800x453

Particular therapy? Juozas Kaziukenas, CEO of e-commerce analysis agency Market Pulse, informed Insider:

  • “It’s clear Apple made a take care of Amazon that isn’t out there to different manufacturers.”
  • “I can’t recall every other model with the identical setup.”

Monetary implications. It’s not but been confirmed whether or not Apple paid Amazon to dam advertisements by rivals from showing on its product pages. Nonetheless, in emails shared by the Home Judiciary Committee that date again to 2018, Amazon’s then-retail CEO Jeff Wilke recommended he had initially refused Apple’s request to dam rival advertisements, writing:

  • “We can’t alter our natural search algorithm to return solely Apple merchandise within the search outcomes when an Apple group is searched.”

He then appeared to supply another answer for Apple:

  • “Apple would want to buy these placements or compensate Amazon for the misplaced advert income.”

Amazon’s promoting unit, a big driver of development and revenue incomes over $38 billion final 12 months, has been increasing advertisements on its platform, as per an FTC lawsuit. Given this context, Amazon’s take care of Apple to restrict rival advertisements on its product pages is especially noteworthy.

Deep dive. Learn our report on Amazon’s ‘secret advert pricing scheme’ for extra data.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *