FTC Sues Promoting Behemoths Google and iHeartMedia for Misleading Endorsements by Radio Personalities

Final week, the Federal Commerce Fee and state attorneys common in Arizona, California, Georgia, Illinois, Massachusetts, New York, and Texas settled with promoting giants Google and iHeartMedia for misleading promoting and endorsements beneath Part 5 of the FTC Act.

The FTC and states allege that Google paid iHeartMedia to file and broadcast adverts that includes “radio personalities” endorsing Google’s cellphone, the Pixel 4. Within the adverts, the radio personalities lavished praised on the Pixel 4, utilizing first-person language to explain the Pixel 4’s functionalities and calling it their favourite cellphone.

The adverts aired over 11,200 instances between October and December 2019. The issue? The Pixel 4 had not been launched on the market, and Google was unable to offer the telephones to the radio personalities earlier than the adverts aired. In essence, the radio personalities have been extolling the Pixel 4 with out ever having used one.

The proposed settlement requires the events to pay $9.4 million to the states. As well as, the proposed orders for each Google and iHeartMedia would prohibit an endorser from misrepresenting that they’ve owned or used a client product. Apparently, the FTC and states declined to pursue a case immediately in opposition to the radio personalities as people, regardless of previous threats to take action.

New York Legal professional Common Letitia James additionally has signaled an aggressive strategy to endorsement instances, saying that “corporations massive and small have a accountability to be sincere about their merchandise and observe the legislation, there aren’t any exceptions. Shoppers should know the reality about merchandise earlier than making any purchases. My workplace is not going to tolerate deceptive claims, and outright lies from advertisers, and we’ll maintain them accountable.”

After all, the FTC has been energetic in cracking down on misleading endorsements and influencer advertising and marketing for years. Final 12 months the FTC took an unprecedented step when it despatched Notices of Penalty Offenses to greater than 700 corporations, together with Google and iHeartMedia, warning them that they may incur civil penalties in the event that they use endorsements in ways in which run counter to the legislation, as interpreted by the FTC in prior instances.

We’ve got beforehand coated how entrepreneurs and platforms can keep away from operating afoul of the FTC’s Guides Regarding the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Promoting. Though the Guides are advisory, they provide insights into how the FTC would possibly evaluation future endorsement instances. As well as, the FTC is contemplating whether or not to codify the Guides into laws.

Related right here, the Guides state that:

• When an advert represents that the endorser makes use of the endorsed product, the endorser should have been a bona fide person of it on the time the endorsement was given
• Advertisers are topic to legal responsibility for false or unsubstantiated statements made by way of endorsements, or for failing to reveal materials connections between themselves and their endorsers; and endorsers additionally could also be accountable for statements made of their endorsements
• Advertisements presenting endorsements by what are represented to be “precise shoppers” ought to make the most of precise shoppers, or clearly and conspicuously disclose that the individuals should not precise shoppers
• An endorsement by a company should be reached by a course of adequate to make sure that the endorsement pretty displays the collective judgment of the group

The authors thank Jay V. Prapaisilp, a legislation clerk in Venable’s Washington, DC workplace, for his help in writing this text.

For extra insights into promoting legislation, bookmark our All About Promoting Legislation weblog and subscribe to our month-to-month e-newsletter.